Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Economics’

Those Who Ignore History…

September 1st, 2010

http://pragcap.com/those-who-ignore-history

by The Pragmatic Capitalist (pragcap.com)

My position over the last 2 years has been as follows: this is a Main Street debt crisis. I have been highly critical of the government’s incessant interventionist policies over the last few years largely because they ignore the actual problems at hand. First it was Mr. Bernanke saving the banks because he believed the credit crisis started with the banking sector. The great monetarist gaffe ensued. Tim Geithner piled on with the PPIP. FASB jumped on board the bank rescue plan by altering the accounting rules. And then the icing on the cake was the Recovery Act, which, in my opinion, just shoveled money into the hole that had become the output gap, without actually trying to target the real cause of the crisis – those burdened by the debt. In essence, the various bailouts primarily targeted everyone except the people who really needed it.
Read more…

Asset Allocation, Banks, Economics, Financial Crises, Growth , , , , , , , , , ,

There’s no Such Thing as a Soveriegn Debt Trap

August 16th, 2010

…Especially for Currency Issuing Soveriegn States

Escaping the Sovereign Debt Trap: The Remarkable Model of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia

http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=20473

by Ellen Brown

The current credit crisis is basically a capital crisis: at a time when banks are already short of the capital needed to back their loans, capital requirements are being raised. Nearly a century ago, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia demonstrated that banks do not actually need capital to make loans – so long as their credit is backed by the government. Denison Miller, the Bank’s first Governor, was fond of saying that the Bank did not need capital because “it is backed by the entire wealth and credit of the whole of Australia.” With nothing but this national credit power, the Commonwealth Bank funded both massive infrastructure projects and the country’s participation in World War I.

President John Adams is quoted as saying, “There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.” The major conquests today are on the battlefield of debt, a war that is raging globally. Debt forces individuals into financial slavery to the banks, and it forces governments to relinquish their sovereignty to their creditors, which in the end are also private banks, the originators of all non-cash money today. Read more…

Banks, Currencies, Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Fed Must Stop Subsidizing Banks for Not Lending

July 27th, 2010

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Issues/The-Economy/2010/07/23/What-Can-the-Fed-Still-Do.aspx

By BRUCE BARTLETT, The Fiscal Times on Jul 23, 2010

This week, Federal Reserve Board chairman Ben Bernanke testified before Congress that the Fed is prepared to take additional actions to stimulate the economy in the event that growth falters. Unfortunately, the Fed does not yet appear to be considering an end to its ill-advised policy of paying interest on excess reserves at banks, which is in effect a subsidy to them for not lending.

Historically, the Fed operates primarily through short-term interest rates. It largely controls a special rate called the federal funds rate, which is the rate at which banks borrow reserves from each other on overnight loans.

Although it is generally assumed that the fed funds rate automatically impacts longer-term rates, there is little evidence that this is the case. In 2004, the fed funds rate was 1.35 percent, the corporate bond rate was 5.63 percent, and the home mortgage rate was 5.77 percent. Then the Fed tightened and the fed funds rate rose to 5 percent. But the corporate bond rate was about the same at 5.56 percent and so was the mortgage rate at 6.41 percent. Now the fed funds rate is close to zero and the corporate bond rate is 4.69 percent and the mortgage rate is just over 5 percent.
Read more…

Banks, Economics, Inflation/Deflation , , , , , , ,

Does Money Growth Stimulate Production or is it the Other Way Around?

July 27th, 2010

Money Supply Confuses Deflation’s Confused Proponents
By John Tamny

http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2010/07/27/money_supply_confuses_deflations_confused_proponents_98592.html

The great British political economist John Stuart Mill long ago noted that “the whole of goods in the market” composes “the demand for money.” To put it more simply, money is just the measuring rod that facilitates the real exchange of actual goods and labor.

As such, when production and labor increases, so does the supply of money. Conversely, when both decrease the supply of money declines. To make basic what is basic, money supply’s expansion and decline is a function of production.

This is important in light of all the handwringing among deflation’s confused proponents at present, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of the Daily Telegraph the most notable in this regard. Watching the “Ms” in decline, Evans-Pritchard notes that they did much the same in the 1930s, and naturally suggests we’re headed for a 1930s style Great Depression.

Assuming we are, it can’t be stressed enough that a decline in the monetary aggregates would be and is a symptom of reduced economic activity, not a driver of same as Evans-Pritchard supposes.

Considering deflation itself, the total perversion of its meaning continues to reach staggering heights. That deflation is always and everywhere a symptom of rising currency values doesn’t seem to concern its true believers despite the fact that the world’s currencies are mostly in decline. That Japan’s deflation was a function of the yen tripling in value against gold (the opposite direction of the world’s currencies today) is wholly ignored by a deflation cult convinced that Japan’s sufferance of an overly strong yen mirrors a period of broad currency weakness. That prices fall all the time thanks to productivity enhancements doesn’t concern its religionists either. That there’s little interest in accessing credit during periods of deflation (borrowers aren’t eager to take out loans that will rise in cost) hasn’t shaken the beliefs of an economic sect that mistakes an inflationary lack of credit for deflation.
Read more…

Banks, Currencies, Economics, Inflation/Deflation , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

My Quarterly Summary to My Clients

July 19th, 2010

To My Clients:

Our accounts are up 5.3 % for the Quarter and up 11.2 % for the year 2010 to date.

Even though the broad stock market indexes are all down over 10 % this past quarter, we have been fortunate once again to show positive returns in our accounts with a targeted and conservative approach. Our tech stock, Sandisk, was up over 20%, our gold stocks were up 12% and our long-term treasury bonds were up 10%. The largest portions of our accounts remain invested in cash and short-term treasury securities. Short-term interest rates will remain at historic lows and we expect long-term interest rates to continue to decline even as federal debt surges.

The alleged “recovery” recently has been showing signs of weakness and debt problems continue across the globe leading to volatility and weakness in the stock markets. There is considerable discussion among economists and analysts as to whether we will enter into a double dip recession. We don’t necessarily agree and tend to follow a recent new term to describe the current outlook for the economy which is “muddle through”. Read more…

Asset Allocation, Banks, Bonds, Economics, Gold, Inflation/Deflation, Markets, Portfolio Management , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Debt and Deflation are the Problem

July 13th, 2010

http://comstockfunds.com/default.aspx?act=Newsletter.aspx&category=SpecialReport&newsletterid=1534&menugroup=Home&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

We understand that we have discussed the debt problem in this country for what seems to be forever, but we can’t stop talking about it now that the debt is clearly the catalyst for the latest stock market downturn. Debt is discussed by the pundits on financial TV also, but in almost every case the discussion revolves around government deficits relative to GDP or government debt relative to GDP. They are constantly comparing the U.S. government debt to every other country in the world (especially Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain-PIIGS). We believe that the government debt should be taking a back seat to the private debt which is much larger and must eventually be deleveraged.
Read more…

Banks, Currencies, Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation, uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Fed Must Print More Money… Lots of It.

June 28th, 2010

by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/7857595/RBS-tells-clients-to-prepare-for-monster-money-printing-by-the-Federal-Reserve.html

Entitled “Deflation: Making Sure It Doesn’t Happen Here”, it is a warfare manual for defeating economic slumps by use of extreme monetary stimulus once interest rates have dropped to zero, and implicitly once governments have spent themselves to near bankruptcy.

The speech is best known for its irreverent one-liner: “The US government has a technology, called a printing press, that allows it to produce as many US dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.”

Bernanke began putting the script into action after the credit system seized up in 2008, purchasing $1.75 trillion of Treasuries, mortgage securities, and agency bonds to shore up the US credit system. He stopped far short of the $5 trillion balance sheet quietly pencilled in by the Fed Board as the upper limit for quantitative easing (QE).

Investors basking in Wall Street’s V-shaped rally had assumed that this bizarre episode was over. So did the Fed, which has been shutting liquidity spigots one by one. But the latest batch of data is disturbing.
Read more…

Asset Allocation, Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation , , , , , , , , , ,

Dangerous Calls for Hooverian Balanced Budget Policies

June 28th, 2010

By Paul Krugman
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/28/opinion/28krugman.html

Recessions are common; depressions are rare. As far as I can tell, there were only two eras in economic history that were widely described as “depressions” at the time: the years of deflation and instability that followed the Panic of 1873 and the years of mass unemployment that followed the financial crisis of 1929-31.

Neither the Long Depression of the 19th century nor the Great Depression of the 20th was an era of nonstop decline — on the contrary, both included periods when the economy grew. But these episodes of improvement were never enough to undo the damage from the initial slump, and were followed by relapses.

We are now, I fear, in the early stages of a third depression. It will probably look more like the Long Depression than the much more severe Great Depression. But the cost — to the world economy and, above all, to the millions of lives blighted by the absence of jobs — will nonetheless be immense.

And this third depression will be primarily a failure of policy. Around the world — most recently at last weekend’s deeply discouraging G-20 meeting — governments are obsessing about inflation when the real threat is deflation, preaching the need for belt-tightening when the real problem is inadequate spending.
Read more…

Asset Allocation, Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation, Markets , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Currency Issuing Governments Need Not Fear Deficits.

May 22nd, 2010


There Is No Such Thing as a Sovereign Budget Deficit.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article19705.html

By Mike Whitney

Deficits create demand. Demand generates spending. Spending generates economic activity. Economic activity generates growth. Growth generates jobs, increases government revenues, reduces deficits and ends recessions.

Simple, right?

When consumers have too much debt, they will not spend no matter how low interest rates are. This is not theory, this is fact.

If the government cuts spending at the same time as consumers, then overall spending declines and the economy slips into recession. This is what the deficit hawks want–a return to recession. This is politics, not economics.

KEYNE’S KOAN: Increasing the deficits, lowers the deficits
Read more…

Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation, Politics , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Danger Posed by Huge Future Deficits ‘is Zero’

May 13th, 2010

by James Galbraith
May 12, 2010

source: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/05/galbraith_the_danger_posed_by.html

James Galbraith is an economist and the Lloyd M. Bentsen Jr. chair in government and business relations at the University of Texas at Austin. He’s also a skeptic of the prevailing concern over America’s long-term deficit. With many people now comparing America’s fiscal condition to Greece, I spoke with Galbraith to get the other side of the argument. An edited transcript of our conversation follows.

EK: You think the danger posed by the long-term deficit is overstated by most economists and economic commentators.

JG: No, I think the danger is zero. It’s not overstated. It’s completely misstated.

EK: Why?

JG: What is the nature of the danger? The only possible answer is that this larger deficit would cause a rise in the interest rate. Well, if the markets thought that was a serious risk, the rate on 20-year treasury bonds wouldn’t be 4 percent and change now. If the markets thought that the interest rate would be forced up by funding difficulties 10 year from now, it would show up in the 20-year rate. That rate has actually been coming down in the wake of the European crisis.

So there are two possibilities here. One is the theory is wrong. The other is that the market isn’t rational. And if the market isn’t rational, there’s no point in designing policy to accommodate the markets because you can’t accommodate an irrational entity.
Read more…

Banks, Bonds, Currencies, Economics, Inflation/Deflation , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The IMF Greece Bailout Policies are Doomed to Fail

May 12th, 2010

The E.U.’s Dangerous Game

By MARK WEISBROT
Published: May 12, 2010

The agreement by the European Union and the International Monetary Fund to provide up to $960 billion of support to the Continent’s weaker economies, as well as to financial markets, has appeared to calm investors worldwide, for the moment.

But this does not resolve the underlying problem, even in the short run.

The problem is one of irrational economic policy. The Greek government has reached an agreement with the E.U. authorities (which include the European Commission and the European Central Bank), and the I.M.F. that will make the current economic problems even worse.

This is known to economists, including the ones at the E.U. and I.M.F. who negotiated the agreement. The projections show that if their program “works,” Greece’s debt will rise from 115 percent of gross domestic product today to 149 percent in 2013. This means that in less than three years, and most likely sooner, Greece will be facing the same crisis that it faces today.
Read more…

Asset Allocation, Bonds, Currencies, Economics, Inflation/Deflation, Politics , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bond Traders Declare Inflation Dead After Yields Fall

April 26th, 2010

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aqpASviGyLQc

April 26 (Bloomberg) — The bond vigilantes who punished governments for profligate spending in past years have gone into hiding.

Sovereign bonds yield an average 2.385 percent, about the same as a year ago and below the average of 3.08 percent in 2008 when the credit market seizure led investors to seek the safety of government debt, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data. The cost to borrow is steady even though the amount of bonds in the index that includes nations from the U.S. to Germany and Japan has grown to $17.4 trillion from $13.4 trillion two years ago.

While the debt helped the global economy recover from its first recession since World War II, yields show bond investors aren’t troubled that the growth will spur inflation. Consumer prices excluding food and energy costs rose 1.5 percent in February from a year earlier in the 30 countries that form the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the smallest gain on record.

“The fact that inflation is very well behaved, that provides the cover for central banks to remain on the sidelines and continue to pursue accommodative policies to help the economy,” said Thomas Girard, a senior money manager who helps oversee $115 billion in fixed-income assets with New York Life Investment Management in New York.
Read more…

Asset Allocation, Bonds, Economics, Inflation/Deflation, Markets , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

My Quarterly Summary to My Clients

April 23rd, 2010

To My Clients:

Our accounts are up 5.4% Y-T-D and up 25.1% for the last twelve months.

The markets continue to show buoyancy as the economy very slowly begins a recovery. To a degree, this is largely a result of the Fed’s ineffectual efforts of getting money in circulation. Using the lowest interest rates in generations, the tactic is still seeking evidence of success. The curse of our banking system that in order to create money in circulation, it is wholly dependent upon loan and debt creation to inject money into the economy. However, consumers having been severely burned, no longer want to be in debt and, banks likewise, don’t really want to lend, sometimes even to their best credits. Money in circulation cannot grow unless people borrow and banks lend. Given the recent rising markets, it appears that banks are largely pumping and loaning money into financial assets instead of into bricks and mortar businesses that create jobs. Full recovery will still take some time.

Having said all of that, the economy is Read more…

Asset Allocation, Banks, Economics, Financial Crises, Gold, Markets, Portfolio Management, Stocks , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Beijing is not Washington’s Banker

February 23rd, 2010

-

What the Peoples Bank of China Can and Cannot do with its Foreign Currency Reserves

http://mpettis.com/2010/02/what-the-pboc-cannot-do-with-its-reserves/

February 22nd, 2010 by Michael Pettis

China did not reduce its dollar holdings
Beijing is not Washington’s banker
Can PBoC reserves protect China?
Balance sheet mismatches
Are there no winners and losers?
Wealth is transferred within China

It is a real toss-up as to which generates more bizarre comment in the international press: Beijing’s long-feared dumping of US Treasuries, or the use and value of the PBoC’s central bank reserves. The revelation last week that Chinese holdings of US Treasury obligations fell in December by $34.2 billion, to $755.4 billion, generated a frisson of fear and excitement, leading one prominent newspaper to worry that “If there is one thing that gets investors twitchy, it is the fear that China is losing its appetite for US government bonds.”

And shouldn’t they get twitchy? After all this reduction in Chinese holdings of Treasury bonds comes from the USG’s TIC data, so it must be true that China is dumping dollars, right?

No need to twitch, it means no such thing. Read more…

Banks, Bonds, Currencies, Economics, Financial Crises , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Does Printing Money Create Debt or is it the Other Way Around?

January 1st, 2010

Recently Sally Hutchins commented on a recent post as follows:

Please continue. So printing more money is creating more debt? Educate me. Love, Sally

Love? Yep. She’s my adorable sister.

Hi Sally:

Let me try to answer your question as succinctly as I can.

“Printing money” is a term used today that nobody really knows what it means. Historically it meant the government physically printed little pieces of paper which were then spent into circulation by buying goods and services the government needed. For example, in the Revolutionary War, the government printed continentals to pay the troops. Allegedly, British counterfieting rendered the currency eventually worthless. Again, when New York Bankers refused Abraham Lincoln additional financing during the Civil War, Lincoln then decided simply to print “greenbacks” to pay the troops. It worked. Merchants accepted greenbacks because Lincoln decreed that greenbacks would be accepted by the government for the payment of taxes. “Greenbacks” remained in circulation for decades and largely contributed to massive subsequent economic growth.

Today, 99 percent of all money in circulation isn’t currency at all, but mere electronic blips or signals recorded on the computerized ledgers of the banking system. Obviously actual printing of money doesn’t really happen anymore in any meaningful way. However, “money creation” is probably a more appropriate term. Money is created when a bank makes a loan. Presto. That’s it. I already know that you’re going to ask Read more…

Banks, Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation, Politics , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Harsh lessons we may need to learn again

December 31st, 2009

Harsh lessons we may need to learn again
By Joseph E. Stiglitz (China Daily)

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2009-12/31/content_9249981.htm

Joseph Stiglitz recounts five “harsh lessons” from 2009:

  1. Markets are not self-correcting.
  2. Recent Markets failed because too-big-to-fail financial institutions had perverse incentives.
  3. Keynesian policies do work.
  4. There is more to monetary policy than just fighting inflation.
  5. Not all innovation leads to a more efficient and productive economy – let alone a better society.

The best that can be said for 2009 is that it could have been worse, that we pulled back from the precipice on which we seemed to be perched in late 2008, and that 2010 will almost surely be better for most countries around the world. The world has also learned some valuable lessons, though at great cost both to current and future prosperity – costs that were unnecessarily high given that we should already have learned them.

The first lesson is that markets are not self-correcting. Indeed, without adequate regulation, they are prone to excess. In 2009, we again saw why Adam Smith’s invisible hand often appeared invisible: it is not there. The bankers’ pursuit of self-interest (greed) did not lead to the well-being of society; it did not even serve their shareholders and bondholders well. It certainly did not serve homeowners who are losing their homes, workers who have lost their jobs, retirees who have seen their retirement funds vanish, or taxpayers who paid hundreds of billions of dollars to bail out the banks.

Under the threat of a collapse of the entire system, the safety net – intended to help unfortunate individuals meet the exigencies of life – was generously extended to commercial banks, then to investment banks, insurance firms, auto companies, even car-loan companies. Never has so much money been transferred from so many to so few.
Read more…

Banks, Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation, Markets, Politics , , , , , , , , , , , ,

It’s “Money in Circulation” Stupid.

October 20th, 2009

During the 1991 recession (if you can call it that) Bill Clinton made a campaign issue of “It’s the economy stupid.” It’s true, it is all about the economy. But it’s also a little more fundamental than that. It’s something that people have known intuitively for centuries. In a good economy, there was always “plenty of money” and in hard times it was “money is scarce”. Things haven’t changed, except that now those responsible for money creation are intentionally clouding the picture with all kinds of economic jawboning (dutifully reported daily by the media) to create a paranoia of both hyperinflation and deflation.
Read more…

Banks, Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation , , , , , , , , , ,

Leading Economic Indicators Confirm Economic Recovery Underway

September 24th, 2009

From Northern Trust Research
September 21, 2009

Chairman Bernanke noted last week that a recovery is most likely underway. Our forecast is for a 2.5% increase in real GDP during the third quarter, which is slightly lower than the market consensus. The advance estimate of real GDP for the third quarter will be published on October 29.

The Index of Leading Economic Indicators rose 0.6% in August, the fifth consecutive monthly increase of the index. On a year-to-year basis, the index moved up 1.89%, the largest gain since May 2006. The July-August average translates to a 1.32% from the third quarter of 2008, the first increase since the first quarter of 2007. Historically, the year-to-year change in the LEI advanced one quarter has a strong positive correlation with the year-to-year change in real GDP (see chart 1). This evidence and other economic reports — ISM manufacturing survey, industrial productions index – support expectations that an economic recovery commenced in the third quarter of 2009.

Real GDPLEI advanced 1 quarterIndex of Leading Economic Indicators vs. Real GDPyear-to-year percent changepercent changer = 0.79

In August, the workweek held steady, jobless claims, orders of non-defense capital goods and real money supply declined. The remaining seven components – orders of durable consumer goods, supplier deliveries, building permits, interest rate spreads, index of consumer expectations, and stock prices moved up. Effectively, there is a widespread improvement in economic conditions, which had been brought about by policy changes. The impact from monetary policy accommodation is evident. The possible impact from the $787 billion fiscal stimulus package will be available in 2010. By the end of fiscal year 2009, roughly 24% of the fiscal package will have been spent.

Asha G. Bangalore
agb3@ntrs.com
Northern Trust Global Economic Research
50 South LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60603
northerntrust.com

Economics, Financial Crises , , , ,

Inflation and the Fall of the Roman Empire

August 24th, 2009

roman-empireThis is a transcript of Prof. Joseph Peden’s 50-minute lecture “Inflation and the Fall of the Roman Empire” given at the Mises Institute Seminar on Money and Government in Houston, Texas on October 27, 1984. The original audio recording is available courtesy of the Mises Institute.

Two centuries ago, in 1776, there were two books published in England, both of which are read avidly today. One of them was Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations and the other was Edward Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Gibbon’s multi-volume work is the tale of a state that survived for twelve centuries in the west and for another thousand years in the east, at Constantinople.

Yet Gibbon in looking at this phenomenon commented that the wonder was not that the Roman Empire had fallen, but rather that it had lasted so long. And scholars since Gibbon have devoted great deal of energy to examining that problem: how was it that the Roman Empire lasted so long,   Read more…

Banks, Currencies, Economics, Financial Crises, Gold, Inflation/Deflation , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How Did China Evade the Meltdown?

August 24th, 2009

The Secrets of China’s Growth: The Government Owns the Banks rather than the Reverse

By Ellen Brown

“The banks — hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created — are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. They frankly own the place.” — U.S. Senator Dick Durbin, Democratic Party Whip, April 30, 2009

While the U.S. spends trillions of dollars to bail out its banking system, leaving its economy to languish, China is being called a “miracle economy” that has decoupled from the rest of the world. As the rest of the world sinks into the worst recession since the 1930s, China has maintained a phenomenal 8% annual growth rate. Those are the reports, but commentators are dubious. They ask how that growth is possible, when other countries relying heavily on exports have suffered major downturns and remain in the doldrums. Economist Richard Wolff skeptically observes:  Read more…

Banks, Currencies, Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation, Markets , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How Little We Know – A classic from my archives

August 23rd, 2009

HOW LITTLE WE KNOW

by Harry Browne

August 22, 1984

You’ve probably had the experience of reading a newsletter’s (blog’s) explanation of what is about to happen in the world. The writer presents a sensible, logical, compelling argument that something is inevitable based on what has gone before and where we are now. His case is so plausible and rational that it’s obvious he must be right.

But then you pick up another newsletter (blog) and find another preview of the inevitable -and it’s exactly opposite to the forecast in the first newsletter. And the second writer’s arguments are just as logical, sensible, plausible, and rational as the first writer’s.

Which one are you supposed to believe? The question could be critical. Each writer might be urging you to invest all your capital in line with his forecast. To choose wrongly could be disastrous.

So how do you decide which one of them is right?   Read more…

Asset Allocation, Economics, Gold, Humor, Markets, Portfolio Management, Stocks , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Inflation vs. Deflation – Inflation wins.

July 25th, 2009

June 21, 2009
by Gary North

Back in 1973, gold standard advocate John Exter made a phrase famous in hard-money circles: “Pushing on a string.” Exter argued that prices of all assets except gold (he ignored silver) would someday collapse because of the pyramiding of debt. Banks would eventually cease to lend, out of fear of default. That would cause the default.

The FED would inflate the monetary base, he said, but this would not reverse the price decline. The commercial banks would not lend. The FED would therefore push on a string. Its attempt to inflate would fail.

Read more…

Banks, Economics, Financial Crises, Inflation/Deflation , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tax Day – Guest Post

April 15th, 2009

This April 15 is the 94th year that Americans have had to file an income tax. For most Americans, the day is a non-event. The federal and state governments have already collected the taxes due by withholding from each paycheck over the course of the calendar year. Most Americans never saw the money and have no real idea that they earned it. Few Americans realize that over the last 94 years they have been enserfed and have no more rights to their own labor than medieval serfs or 19th century slaves.
Read more…

Economics ,

Robert Samuelson: China and Dollar Deception.

April 6th, 2009

Robert Samuelson posted an article today about what he thinks China is up to: China Engages in Dollar Deception.

Given the dollar’s drawbacks, why not switch to something else, as Zhou suggests? The trouble, as even he concedes, is that there’s no obvious replacement. The attraction of an international currency depends on its presumed stability, what it will buy and how easy it is to invest. The euro (27 percent of government reserves) and the yen (3 percent) don’t yet rival the dollar. As for China, it hasn’t made its own currency (the renminbi, or RMB) automatically convertible for Chinese investments.

We’re stuck with the dollar standard for a while. To work, it requires that countries with huge trade surpluses reduce the export-led growth that fed the system’s instabilities. The Chinese increasingly recognize this. “They’re very aware of the need to promote consumer spending,” says economist Pieter Bottelier of Johns Hopkins University. In November, China announced a 4 trillion RMB ($586 billion) “stimulus.” In addition, says Bottelier, the government is improving health and pension benefits to dampen households’ need for high savings.

Currencies, Economics , ,

A “must read” guest article.

March 31st, 2009

I’ve written about Simon Johnson and the banking oligarchs before here and here. The Atlantic Monthly just published his most recent writings on the banking crisis. He is scathing in his assessement of our finanancial institutions (the oligarchs), almost as scathing of our governmental response, and lays out precisely what we must do to restore our economy, with which I am obviously in agreement since I am posting a link to the article here for your reading enjoyment. It’s lengthy so read it when you have some time.

Simon Johnson happens to be a pretty smart guy as he is a former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, is a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management and a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. I follow his analysis closely in his own blog at baselinescenario.com.

Very Best Regards,

Joe

Banks, Economics , , , , , , ,