Where’s a Jacksonian when you need one?
Big banks cannot be reined in through some clever tweaking of the rules. The issue before us is intensely political – just as it was in the first decade of the twentieth century (and in Jackson’s era). There is again a confrontation between concentrated financial power and our democracy. One side will win and the other side will lose.
The banks start with a definite edge. The public relations machines of today’s bankers may be even more effective than those of Morgan and Rockefeller – although the campaign contributions and control of the Senate exercised by those titans was immense.
But it is still early days – the Senate legislation expected this week or next will achieve nothing, except make the stakes clearer and motivations more transparent. If the banks win this round, as seems likely, they will become even larger – and more dangerous. At current scale, our megabanks bring no social benefits and great social risks.
Just as a hundred years ago, the consensus on big banks has to change. In this instance, either we break them up or they will soon break us all.
